Case Studies
Inventory Forecasting for After-Sales Service Network
Key Results
- 365K+ repairs modeled across 15 service centers
- 99.9% parts availability maintained
- ~24% reduction in inventory penalty exposure
About the project
A worldwide construction equipment manufacturer engaged PerformaCode to redesign inventory forecasting across its after-sales service network. The organization operates 15 distributed service centers responsible for warranty repairs with a guaranteed three-day turnaround window.
The project focused on forecasting demand for repair parts using historical service data and aligning inventory levels across centers. The system needed to account for seasonal repair cycles, regional differences between service branches in multiple EU countries, and heterogeneous material demand across the portfolio, while operating within the existing logistics and planning infrastructure.
PerformaCode was responsible for end-to-end technical execution, including data analysis and normalization, time-series model development, material segmentation, cost-aware optimization logic, and preparation of an integration-ready forecasting framework.
3
engineers
6
months
FP
delivery model
Client challenges
The service network operated under a strict three-day repair commitment across geographically distributed centers. Parts availability directly affected contractual obligations and customer satisfaction, while excess stock increased storage cost and capital exposure. Forecast accuracy therefore had immediate financial impact.
Historical repair data was unevenly distributed across materials and regions. A small subset of parts accounted for most repair volume, while long-tail materials showed sparse and irregular demand. Seasonal cycles and regional differences across EU branches introduced variability that could not be captured by aggregate models.
Inventory decisions followed asymmetric business rules, where shortages carried significantly higher penalty than overstock. Standard symmetric error metrics were insufficient for evaluating performance under these constraints.
Repair records contained boundary inconsistencies and non-uniform temporal patterns. Weekly aggregation improved operational relevance but increased sensitivity to outliers and rare demand spikes.
The forecasting framework needed to integrate with existing logistics systems and remain stable under continuous updates, scaling across materials and regions while preserving transparency for business stakeholders.
Tasks performed
- Analyzed and normalized historical repair datasets covering 365K+ records, resolving boundary inconsistencies, temporal gaps, and irregular material identifiers
- Designed weekly time-series aggregation logic aligned with operational planning cycles across distributed service centers
- Performed material segmentation based on repair frequency, Pareto distribution, and demand volatility
- Implemented multiple forecasting models including Holt-Winters, SARIMA, Prophet, and baseline naive approaches for comparative evaluation
- Developed sliding-window cross-validation framework for time-series backtesting under rolling forecast scenarios
- Designed asymmetric cost metric incorporating weighted deficit and overstock penalties aligned with business rules
- Built forecast “shift” optimizer to bias predictions toward availability targets under non-symmetric cost exposure
- Evaluated model performance per material cluster rather than applying a uniform global model
- Integrated regional and seasonal signals including holiday calendars and sales correlations into model inputs
- Implemented automated model comparison pipeline with metric aggregation across time windows
- Validated forecast stability under rare-demand and long-tail scenarios
- Designed integration-ready forecasting interface suitable for connection to logistics and shipment planning systems
- Documented model assumptions, performance characteristics, and deployment requirements for operational transition
Project results
365K+ Records Structured
Standardized 365,000+ repair records across 15 centers into a single weekly dataset, enabling consistent forecasting instead of branch-level manual planning.
24% Inventory Cost Reduction
Reduced weighted inventory penalty from 37.66 to 28.62 by adjusting forecasts to reflect higher shortage costs, lowering excess stock without risking part availability.
0.48% Demand Deficit
Lowered demand deficit to 0.485% through rolling time-series validation, supporting the three-day repair commitment across all service centers.
83 Materials Segmented
Separated material categories by demand frequency and volatility, replacing one global model with tier-specific forecasting logic tailored to usage patterns.
3 Demand Tiers Introduced
Established dedicated forecasting approaches for high-volume, mid-volume, and sparse-demand parts, preventing long-tail volatility from distorting core inventory planning.
15 Centers Forecast-Aligned
Integrated seasonal and regional demand differences across 15 service centers in multiple EU countries into one coordinated forecasting framework.
Rolling Validation Across Seasons
Validated forecasts using sliding historical windows, confirming stable performance during both peak and low-demand periods.
Weekly Planning Outputs Delivered
Produced structured weekly forecasts compatible with logistics systems, enabling automated allocation decisions.
Value we bring
Senior-Led Forecast Design Without Overengineering
We build forecasting systems that improve decisions, not model complexity. By evaluating advanced methods against simpler approaches under real cost constraints, we select solutions that are transparent, maintainable, and economically justified. This prevents organizations from inheriting fragile pipelines that are difficult to validate or operate, and ensures predictive logic remains aligned with business impact rather than algorithmic novelty.
Segmented Modeling Architecture for Heterogeneous Portfolios
We treat forecasting as an architectural problem before it becomes a modeling problem. Instead of applying one global model and tuning around its weaknesses, we design tiered forecasting structures aligned with demand behavior from the outset. By separating high-volume, mid-volume, and sparse-demand items into dedicated logic layers, we prevent long-tail volatility from distorting core planning decisions and create systems that remain stable, scalable, and economically controllable across uneven portfolios.
Cross-Regional Forecast Harmonization
We design forecasting frameworks that unify distributed operations while respecting regional variability. Seasonal effects, branch-level usage patterns, and local demand shifts are incorporated directly into model structure rather than overridden by centralized assumptions. The result is coordinated planning that remains region-aware, reducing friction between central strategy and local execution in multi-site environments.
Technologies
- Python
- Pandas
- NumPy
- SciPy
- scikit-learn
- statsmodels
- Prophet
- Apache Spark
- TensorFlow
- MQTT
- REST API
- Docker
Other Case Studies
Autonomous Driving ML Toolchain Validation
Validation and sustaining engineering for an autonomous driving ML...

